23 Comments
founding

i don’t know what the punishment/remedy is for the coordinated destruction of Flavio’s work & reputation by corrupt mortals playing god; however, it should begin with him taking what you wrote to a legal team that includes defamation, fraud & antitrust experts. There’s a firm that comes to mind, and an old friend who at least might listen to Flavio.

This must be exposed & stopped. You know where to reach me--when you return from Orlando.

These evil people are playing a dangerous game.

Expand full comment

“game-change-uh”

I suppose having the ability to cloak mass murder under CDC protocols was indeed a game-change-uh! 🤣

Thank you for informing us about proxalutamide—I had never even heard of it! And it doesn’t appear to be on John Droz’s radar (https://c19science.info/FDA_Drug_Approvals2.htm) either—maybe because the research has been thwarted/suppressed, so there isn’t enough to merit inclusion on his list?

I loved hearing about your own journey toward becoming a doctor, Pierre. I wonder if the fact that you came to this career later in life has made you less vulnerable to the groupthink that most doctors succumb to (besides your unassailable integrity and innate sensitivity to propaganda).

Expand full comment

The psych-sociopathology of the oligarchs beggars the imagination. Their all-consuming belief that they're entitled to crush any kind of dissent against the covid narrative is arrogant, enraging and diabolical. They have zero humanity left and are despicable parasites who are destroying all that is beautiful and sacred.

Expand full comment
Oct 9, 2022Liked by Pierre Kory, MD, MPA

As I read this.. I hear your voice.. lol.. Next time incorporate a audio version... That would be fun to listen to.

Expand full comment

We've created alternative outlets for corrupt media outlets. We should do the same for med journals. Maybe Elon will buy one.

Expand full comment

proxalutamide ............. ahah! good to know, will look into it more ......... starting to do searches on "xyz" and cancer, everytime they fight to suppress "xyz" something....just because there is so much money in cancer screening and treatment and yet it seems like there are so many doctors and researchers with great different ideas for eliminating it ..... maybe it isn't as hard to fix ... the best ideas have just been suppressed?? The whole medical high profit industry seems very brittle with only a few widely accepted changes population wide might cut its profits very significantly.... like in half ?? or even more ??? higher blood levels of vitamin d (40-60, even 60-80... over 80 apparently will eliminate 85% of breast cancer cases?? not to mention all of the other common cancers page 244 I believe it is....in the 2010 book "The Vitamin D Solution" by Dr. Michael Holick a 40 year pioneer in vitamin d research, high doses of vitamin c (Dr. Robert Cathcart ... incredible information and use in 25,000 patients (wikipedia had his entry ... I know I read it in the 2020 time frame but it is deleted from wikipedia now in 2022) , intraveneous vitamin c, ivermectin, low dose naltrexone, suramin, niacin and kidney disease, now proxalutamide .............. everything they start fighting so viciously just reveals the truth more .... I look deeper whenever they are fighting to suppress something ......... so many great medical advances have been suppressed. Wondering once there are actually studies done comparing the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated populations .... if it will be the end of the vaccine era ... and a huge new era of good health based on vitamin d, vitamin c, and ivermectin will begin because they are better than vaccines.

Expand full comment

I was wondering whatever happened with proxalutamide. Perhaps related; an older fellow I know takes dutesteride and has done so for more than a decade. No COVID infection, not ever, even though he has definitely been exposed. I always wondered if that mattered. Would have been awfully handy to know. But at least nobody died, so there's that.

Things really are horribly corrupt. Perhaps the normal, honest people have all quietly resigned in protest (having signed the usual non-disparagment agreements which force them to remain silent), and only the total scumbags remain. Evolution in action? The crap floats to the top?

Sigh. Thanks for clearing up the proxalutamide mystery.

Expand full comment

Not only is it time for a parallel economy, it’s also more than time for a parallel healthcare system. On second thought, no… it’s time for an altogether health system.

Expand full comment

Dr. Kory .. Thank you for this discussion . I have a better understanding of why you said overweight bald males have poorer outcomes with hospitalization with Covid.

Expand full comment

Why is the tagline “healthcare” it should simply be health. Healthcare implies something is wrong, therefore we need care. The impetus should be to promote health. But I’m a crazy person. 4 out of 5 dentists agree.

Expand full comment

I just googled "Eric Rubin" and his Wikipedia page came up first so I clicked. It is quite brief... Since these frauds love to change other peoples Wiki pages.... shouldn't we include this story of Fabio's where Eric rejected his study from the NEJM... so that HISTORY can hold Mr. Rubin accountable when the truth comes out in the end. Why let him have such a CLEAN Wiki page, when he is anything but CLEAN???

Expand full comment

Just last Friday: My friend and colleague, a retired doctor in San Antonio died of sudden and mysterious heart damage. He was previously well, when suddenly he went into ventricular fibrillation and "died" while riding in an auto driven by his wife. He was one of the few who was revived after the event. He was subsequently discovered to have unexplained, valvular destruction and severe myocarditis. No family hx, no comorbidities except well-controlled, Type-1 diabetes. No previous heart issues. The attending reportedly told his wife that my friend's demise was likely covid related. No known history of covid, just the vaccine.

Expand full comment

Wow... just looked up Proxalutamide ................ as of today, 10/10/2022 ... this is the wikipedia entry..... it mentions proxalutamide and breast cancer ..... did a quick search on incidence of breast cancer and found the World Health Organization link .......... I don't rely on them for medical solutions but for incidence information ... they would probably at least be accurate or possibly inflated numbers ... but all of that to say, drugs that also fix high incidence and high profit diseases like breast cancer...... are definitely and swiftly suppressed. The key is, whatever they are suppressing is a great answer to something big that is afflicting alot of people. Like ivermectin ..... Dr. Hulda Clark's amazing detailed books from the 1990s .... say parasites and toxins are the source of all diseases ..... ivermectin is a big threat .... along with higher blood levels of vitamin d .... Dr. Michael Holick, 40 year vitamin d says on page 244 I believe it is of his 2010 book The Vitamin D Solution, that 80% of breast cancer ... not to mention other cancers... could be eliminated with higher blood levels of vitamin d .... blood levels in the 80s would eliminate 80 some% of breast cancers?? ... book written in 2010.... why have I never heard of it before in all of the times I have gone for a mammogram?? why have my doctors never heard of it before?? who is threatening my doctors?? Proxalutamide wikipedia entry............. "developmental code name GT-0918) is a nonsteroidal antiandrogen (NSAA) – specifically, a selective high-affinity silent antagonist of the androgen receptor (AR) – which is under development by Suzhou Kintor Pharmaceuticals, inc., a subsidiary of Kintor Pharmaceutical Limited, for the potential treatment of COVID-19, prostate cancer, and breast cancer.[1][2][3][4][5] It was approved in Paraguay for the treatment of COVID-19 in July 2021, but has not been approved at this time in other countries.[1]" ************************* copied from the World Health Organization website today 10/10/2022 "Scope of the problem

In 2020, there were 2.3 million women diagnosed with breast cancer and 685 000 deaths globally. As of the end of 2020, there were 7.8 million women alive who were diagnosed with breast cancer in the past 5 years, making it the world’s most prevalent cancer. There are more lost disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) by women to breast cancer globally than any other type of cancer. Breast cancer occurs in every country of the world in women at any age after puberty but with increasing rates in later life.

Breast cancer mortality changed little from the 1930s through to the 1970s. Improvements in survival began in the 1980s in countries with early detection programmes combined with different modes of treatment to eradicate invasive disease." info dated March 2021, copied from this link https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/breast-cancer

Expand full comment

Here is the Wiki page on the proxalutamide trial-

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covid-19_proxalutamide_trial_in_Brazil

Expand full comment

"Recall that The Lancet is the same journal that published the fraudulent Surgisphere study of hydroxychloroquine with clearly fabricated data - a scandal that the world has conveniently forgotten about. Good times."

Well why dont we remind the WORLD OF THE LANCET'S ALLOWANCE OF FRAUDLENT STUDIES.. here the the Wiki statement on that fraudulent Surgisphere study... oh so brief.. so cute... BUT IT THE REAL STORY REALLY NEEDS TO BE TOLD.

***(from Wiki)- Metastudy on the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine (2020)

In May 2020, The Lancet published a metastudy by Mandeep R. Mehra of the Harvard Medical School and Dr. Sapan S. Desai of Surgisphere Corporation, which concluded that the malaria drugs hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine did not improve the condition of COVID-19 patients, and may have harmed some of them.[41]

In response to concerns raised by members of the scientific community and the media about the veracity of the data and analyses,[42][43][44]The Lancet decided to launch an independent third party investigation of Surgisphere and the metastudy. Specifically, The Lancet editors wanted to "evaluate the origination of the database elements, to confirm the completeness of the database, and to replicate the analyses presented in the paper."[45] The independent peer reviewers in charge of the investigation notified The Lancet that Surgisphere would not provide the requested data and documentation. The authors of the metastudy then asked The Lancet to retract the article, which was done on June 3, 2020.[41][46][47]

As a step to increase quality control, the editors of The Lancet Group announced changes to the editorial policy in a comment titled "Learning from a retraction" which was published on September 22, 2020.[48][49]

Expand full comment